table Samuel said that 16:36 was equivalent to 72:32. What was Samuel’s error? 1) The ratio was not chosen fro

Question

table
Samuel said that 16:36 was equivalent to 72:32.

What was Samuel’s error?

1) The ratio was not chosen from the same columns.
2) He did not look at the correct rows.
3) This problem was impossible. 16:36 has no equivalent ratios.
4) The first and second terms for both ratios need to be in the same order.

HURRY PLEASE

in progress 0
Kaylee 21 mins 2021-10-14T03:52:31+00:00 2 Answers 0

Answers ( )

    0
    2021-10-14T03:53:35+00:00

    Answer: the 4th option is correct

    Step-by-step explanation:

    0
    2021-10-14T03:53:44+00:00

    4) The first and second terms for both ratios need to be in the same order.

    Step-by-step explanation:

    Given ratio is:

    16:36

    In order to find any ratio equivalent to given ratio, the ratio can be divided by a number or multiplied to a number.

    The equivalent ratio that is given: 72:32

    If we multiply the given ratio by 2: We get 32:72

    So,

    Looking at the options we can conclude that the right answer is

    4) The first and second terms for both ratios need to be in the same order.

    Keywords: Ratio, Fractions

    Learn more about ratios at:

    • brainly.com/question/1993757
    • brainly.com/question/2048256

    #LearnwithBrainly

Leave an answer

Browse
Browse

27:3+15-4x7+3-1=? ( )